Warrant Canary
Keep a clear record of what KoaHost says about confidential demands and access to customer data. Our canary brings those statements together, with dates you can check and a copy you can keep.
Our declaration
SIX COMMITMENTSHere is what KoaHost states for the issue dated below.
No credentials handed over
We have given no third party a key, a certificate or an access credential controlled by KoaHost.
No backdoors
We have installed neither a backdoor nor an interception or lawful-access mechanism in our infrastructure.
No secret disclosure
We have shared no customer data with a third party because of a secret order.
No gag orders
We have not received an order to stay silent or a direction to withhold disclosure.
No national security letters
Not one National Security Letter (NSL) has been received by us.
No government warrants
We have not received a warrant from any governmental body.
Why publish the same declaration regularly?
Sometimes the recipient of a legal demand is forbidden to tell anyone about it. A canary gives readers a regularly repeated positive statement to follow. If renewal stops, that gap may be informative even though the demand itself is never described. Check how the page is maintained and look for independent evidence.
Save today’s copy for your next visit
Download or save the declaration, and keep any signature actually provided. When you return, compare the claims, dates and arrangement with your copy. A change deserves a closer look. You can also consult an independent record such as the Wayback Machine rather than relying on a single visit.
Questions about this statement
Is the canary enough on its own?
No. Compare it with the provider policies, use of encryption and other checkable information. Countries have different legal rules, and compelled renewal may be possible.
Which jurisdiction applies?
The law that applies depends on the operator, the service and the location concerned. The United States' NSL framework does not describe every country. A list of hosting locations does not by itself establish protection from a confidential order.